Meeting Time: April 07, 2020 at 4:00pm PDT
The online Comment window has expired

Agenda Item

S.-3 20-0605 Approval by the Board of Education of a Charter School Facilities Agreement between District and Aspire Public Schools, Inc., a California non-profit public benefit corporation ("Aspire") operating Aspire Berkeley Maynard Academy (the nonprofit corporation and the Berkley Maynard Academy, for use of the facilities (formerly Golden Gate Elementary School) located at 6200 San Pablo Avenue, Oakland, CA 94608-2228, for a term of fifteen (15) consecutive fiscal years, commencing on July 1, 2020 and ending on June 30, 2035, subject to earlier termination as set forth in this Agreement ("Initial Term"), for annual rent as set forth in Section 3 of Agreement.

  • Default_avatar
    Irene Yen over 4 years ago

    We need to keep Oakland facilities for Oakland public schools. Charter schools are not public schools. They do not have to have unionized employees. They do not have to adhere to the same education regulations. It perpetuates a tiered system of education.

  • Default_avatar
    Connie Hurtado over 4 years ago

    I support the facilities lease renewal for BMA which is successfully serving Black & Brown students. It provides families with choice, equity and access to high quality education. BMA is a model school that has received national recognition for the amazing work that they do for Black & Brown students. Why would anyone want to disrupt that? They work hard to provide the best possible support toward higher learning.

  • Default_avatar
    C P over 4 years ago

    Oppose

  • Default_avatar
    Heath Madom over 4 years ago

    I oppose

  • Default_avatar
    Jennifer Vetter over 4 years ago

    I am opposed.

  • Default_avatar
    K Hoffman over 4 years ago

    Support - BMA has earned recognition multiple times for its effectiveness in serving students and families of color and deserves to continue its operation in that space.

  • Default_avatar
    Yael Friedman over 4 years ago

    This resolution is insulting to Oakland families. A 40 year lease is not something that must not be authorized during a global health crisis. This resolution takes advantage of parents’ current inability to engage on their own behalf. How dare you push long term privatization of our public schools instead of funding current OUSD students. OUSD teachers demand that OUSD’s debt be forgiven, not pay off the debts of privatizers.

  • Default_avatar
    carolyn brown over 4 years ago

    This is such a bad idea and sets a terrible president.

  • Default_avatar
    L Hikida over 4 years ago

    Focus OUSD time and resources on the district’s public schools that truly serve ALL students.

  • Default_avatar
    Sophie Richman over 4 years ago

    I strongly oppose the choice to allow Aspire to take control of the building. Please make Aspire find somewhere else!

  • Default_avatar
    Nancy Kaufmancohen over 4 years ago

    Oppose

  • Default_avatar
    Jason Wins over 4 years ago

    This is not the time to push through a lease that will last 4 decades!

  • Default_avatar
    Cathy Connelly over 4 years ago

    I oppose giving charter schools OUSD properties essentially rent free. This is stealing from our students! Please at least postpone the vote on this, as approving it feels criminal. Thanks for listening.

  • Default_avatar
    Frank Chang over 4 years ago

    This is financially irresponsible.

  • Default_avatar
    Andrew Burgasser over 4 years ago

    Oppose

  • Default_avatar
    Chris Frost over 4 years ago

    Now is not the time. This is not the solution.

  • Default_avatar
    Mrs Lindsey over 4 years ago

    BMA is a staple school in the north oakland community that has served generations of families. Before it became a charter is was Golden Gate Elementary and that is one of the reasons why so many children are still enrolled and attending. Families do what feels safe for them and returning to a location that was/is familiar to them provides that security. Many families who live in this community have their children enrolled at BMA; they were BMA (Golden Gate) children themselves. These children deserve to be educated in facilities that are clean, safe and modernized. High quality learning happens in high quality environments. All children deserve both of these attributes in their schools while receiving quality public education.

  • Default_avatar
    Lil West over 4 years ago

    OUSD schools have already suffered from many millions in budget cuts over the past few years, and with the uncertainty of the economy post Covid-19, it is likely to continue - OUSD needs every dollar of revenue from every source and to give up $17 million on this lease alone is unconscionable when this board continues to make cuts to schools. This charter will not be the last to ask for a 40 year term, at least 5 other schools could get Prop 51 loans, and those charter schools will want the same terms, resulting in more than $50 million in lost general fund revenue, the very revenue we need to support students and educators at school sites. We need to get this right now. The charter industry is pushing these low or no cost leases across California as a way to grow charter schools, something OUSD cannot afford to do.

  • Default_avatar
    Heather Kuiper over 4 years ago

    Please do not be swayed by a special interest group - your charge is to the district and the public. Please postpone or vote no on the 40 year lease. OUSD cannot take more mistakes and this is a big one.

  • Default_avatar
    NIck Palmquist over 4 years ago

    As a teacher and Oakland resident, this is not the right time to support a 40 year charter lease. We are already in a budget deficit and will certainly be in a larger one next year. This budget deficit undermines 38,000 students in OUSD. To sign a 40 year lease will severely impact every single one of those students going forward as we face a larger deficit and cuts. Especially in these times, this is not the right decision. And especially when there are two years on this lease, this is not appropriate. Reject the lease!