Meeting Time: August 12, 2026 at 4:00pm PDT
Note: The online Request to Speak window has expired.

Agenda Item

V.-1 26-1706 Adoption, by the Board of Education, of Resolution No. 2627-0126 - Responsible Use of 1:1 Student Devices.

Hello Guest User

Please enter your information or Sign In


   Oppose     Neutral     Support    
1000 of 1000 characters remaining
  • Default_avatar
    Mitja Trampus 2 months ago

    As an OUSD parent, as a first-hand witness of the addictiveness of screens (aren't we all), and as a tech developer, I am strongly in support of this resolution and urge the board to accept it and consider going even further.

    The kids need technology skills, but with grade-based, research-supported, developmentally appropriate guidelines, not unlimited access.

    Los Angeles Unified has already implemented a comprehensive screen policy district-wide, going beyond guidelines to enforceable limits on devices during school hours. Many research studies link excessive classroom screen time to lower achievement, anxiety, depression, and reduced attention span; soft, qualitative crowd wisdom and experience points to the same.

    This resolution is well thought out, with a reasonable and concrete timeline, and I urge the board to support it, and continue working in this direction.

  • Default_avatar
    Sofia Ahmad 2 months ago

    As an OUSD parent, I ask the Board to approve this edtech resolution. The school day should not add unnecessary screen time to our kids’ school day. I especially support ending recreational Chromebook use at lunch, recess, and classroom free time. Those moments should be for play, conversation, and rest - the things kids actually need to thrive. This resolution doesn't remove technology from learning; it simply ensures devices are used purposefully and safely. We limit our elementary school-aged child's screen time at home, as recommended by his pediatrician and research. I know that screen time in the class isn't consistently high, and there are less harmful uses (eg listening to audiobooks), but I have been shocked to hear about the high usage of screens for "choice time," especially when the screen time is used for addictive, game-type, apps.
    Please pass this resolution and support our teachers to reduce non-essential screen time.

  • Default_avatar
    Benjamin Hoehn 2 months ago

    I'm supportive of this as a parent who works in technology and actively limits my children's screen time. Even though there are many educational documentaries and books we read online, we've reinforced paper books at home this year more than ever. There should be limited screen time at schools.

  • Default_avatar
    Lara Clayman 2 months ago

    I support this ed tech resolution and ask the Board to go further. Technology use during the school day should be evidence-based, intentional, necessary, and effective. How do Chromebooks and gamified apps actually support learning? School shouldn't add unnecessary screen time to kids' lives. I especially support ending recreational Chromebook use at lunch, recess, and free time — those moments should be for play, conversation, and rest, what kids actually need to thrive. The district must show data that screen use at this age, and these specific programs, support learning and social development. Kids learn best in relationship with attuned teachers, not screens. I'm also concerned devices sometimes give teachers a break or manage instructional demands. I don't believe iReady offers meaningful educational value, a decision grounded in research on both its effectiveness and its impact on kids' well-being. I've opted my children out of iReady and Sown to Grow.

  • Default_avatar
    Kristina Tuohey 2 months ago

    As an OUSD elementary school parent, I ask the Board to approve this edtech resolution. I understand our children need to learn technology, but I question how much screen time is necessary at this age. I would rather see my daughter spending her school day on foundational skills—writing, reading, creating, playing—with her teachers & classmates before adding more screen time. I've also seen firsthand how programs like Prodigy don't necessarily deepen learning. My daughter often focuses on getting through the math to get to the game, then asks me to buy a membership. I've questioned why an elementary school would introduce a commercial product that encourages children to want something they don't need to learn math. I especially support ending recreational Chromebook use during lunch, recess, and free time which should be time for play, conversation, movement, creativity, and rest. This resolution asks us to use technology intentionally and appropriately. Please pass this resolution.

  • Default_avatar
    Jessica Sud 2 months ago

    As an OUSD parent, I ask the Board to approve this edtech resolution. The school day should not add unnecessary screen time to our kids’ school day. I especially support ending recreational Chromebook use at lunch, recess, and classroom free time. Those moments should be for play, conversation, and rest - the things kids actually need to thrive. This resolution doesn't remove technology from learning; it simply ensures devices are used purposefully and safely. Please pass this resolution.

  • Default_avatar
    car_oikt car_oikt 2 months ago

    For travelers seeking convenient car rentals at Westchester County Airport, check out this guide <a href=http://bazil.info/en/how-to-rent-a-car-at-westchester-county-airport-hpn-a-travelers-practical-guide/>hpn car rental companies</a>.
    Because demand fluctuates seasonally, comparing offers and searching for discounts or loyalty benefits can lower costs.

  • Default_avatar
    Jessica Isaacs 2 months ago

    I'm an OUSD parent and even as an adult, I struggle with the responsible use of technology in my life. I'm strongly in favor of setting clear standards and guidelines to ensure that technology is used consistently and fit for purpose for our kids. Thank you!