Meeting Time: October 28, 2026 at 9:00pm PDT

Disclaimer:

Would you please share with us your view(s) or position(s) on a meeting agenda item? Your comments and information will become part of the public record of this web site, which is external to the legislative meeting minutes. If you do not wish your personal information included in the public record of this site, please omit completion of that field.


Agenda Item

26-1791 Approval by the Board of Education of a Customer Agreement by and between the District and Curriculum Associates, LLC, North Billerica, MA, for the latter to provide hosting, maintenance, upgrades and associated support for the i-Ready online learning platform, inclusive of Exhibits A through D:A-H: o Exhibit A: Price Quote for products and services o Exhibit B: i-Ready® Platform Privacy Policy o Exhibit C: California Addendum to Customer Contract o Exhibit D: Standard Student Data Privacy Agreement § Exhibit A: Description of Services § Exhibit B: Schedule of Data § Exhibit C: Definitions § Exhibit D: Special Instructions for Disposition of Data § Exhibit E: General Offer of Privacy Terms § Exhibit F: Data Security Requirements § Exhibit G: Supplemental State Terms for California & AI Addendum § Exhibit H: Additional Terms or Modifications, incorporated herein by reference as though fully set forth, for the term effective October 20, 2026, through October 20, 2029, in an amount not to exceed $861,136.23.

This meeting is open for public comment. By registering to speak, you agree to be present during the meeting time. You will be called to speak by your name.

Hello Guest User

Please enter your information or Sign In


   Oppose     Neutral     Support    
1000 of 1000 characters remaining
  • Default_avatar
    Shawna Reeves at October 28, 2026 at 6:43pm PDT

    This is the absolute wrong time for OUSD to be pushing through an iReady contract renewal. Our kids deserve so much better than a program that does not lead to better academic outcomes and turns them against learning. Curriculum Associates' questionable policies around student data and privacy must also be taken into account when evaluating this contract.

  • Default_avatar
    Dian L at October 28, 2026 at 5:59pm PDT

    Sloppy work - Alicia Arenas, you need a do over. There are multiple substantive errors that need to be corrected - like mathematical/billing stuff. Like run it through Claude one time even, if you are missing brain cells the tech overlords have found a way to outsource thinking

    See Lauren Hamilton's e-comment - Chabot is charged two different amounts? YIKES. Also give us more than 24 hours to review? Considering that the 1:1 device resolution adopted last month requires review of edtech license contracts before renewal?

  • Default_avatar
    Lauren Hamilton at October 28, 2026 at 5:46pm PDT

    Why are Chabot and Highland Community charged twice in this quote? Who is reading these before submitting for approval?