Disclaimer:

Would you please share with us your view(s) or position(s) on a meeting agenda item? Your comments and information will become part of the public record of this web site, which is external to the legislative meeting minutes. If you do not wish your personal information included in the public record of this site, please omit completion of that field.


Agenda Item

O.-58 25-2577 Adoption by the Board of Education of Resolution No. 2526-0184 - Denying Approval of Proposition 2 Charter School Facilities Program Application of Yu Ming Charter School for District property located at 4551 Steele Street, aka Tilden Site, in Oakland.

Hello Guest User

Please enter your information or Sign In


   Oppose     Neutral     Support    
1000 of 1000 characters remaining
  • Default_avatar
    Patrick Wong at October 21, 2025 at 5:12pm PDT

    I respectfully submit my opposition to the Board of Education's denial of the Proposition 2 application, and support the related application. The application furthers Proposition 2's goal of funding the renovation of our public school buildings, and enhances future opportunities to increase OSUD high school attendance, particularly those that offer Chinese Mandarin classes. Thank you for your consideration. 

  • Default_avatar
    Sherilyn Tran at October 21, 2025 at 4:41pm PDT

    As a California voter, I specifically supported Prop 2 because of the conditions of the schools I attended growing up in Oakland (K-12). I recall the poorly ventilated classrooms, the peeling paint, the constant broken toilets in the restrooms that lacked toilet paper - students attending schools in Oakland deserve better and should have the opportunity to not worry about the conditions of their school facility so they can focus on their academic and social development. I strongly oppose the Board's denial of the Prop 2 application to renovate this facility that would allow Oakland to foster stronger and more inclusive communities that will potentially feed into our local high schools.

  • Default_avatar
    Wendy Chen at October 21, 2025 at 4:32pm PDT

    Hi, I would like to oppose the denial. Prop 2 was voted by CA residents to renovate public school buildings and I would love to see the funds used accordingly. Thank you for your consideration.

  • Default_avatar
    Jess Kue at October 21, 2025 at 3:42pm PDT

    As a parent of a school-aged child, I respectfully oppose Agenda Item O.-58 (25-2577), Adoption by the Board of Education of Resolution No. 2526-0184, and express my support for the related application.
    As a California voter, I supported Proposition 2 with the understanding that these funds would be dedicated to renovating and improving public school facilities to ensure safe and equitable learning environments for all students. This is also an opportunity for OUSD to broaden high school capacity particularly at campuses that offer bilingual programs to prepare our students to become culturally aware and globally minded citizens.

  • Default_avatar
    Fanny Pan at October 21, 2025 at 2:37pm PDT

    I'm an Oakland resident/school age parent and I strongly oppose Agenda Item O.-58 25-2577 Adoption by the Board of Education of Resolution No. 2526-0184 and support the application. I, as a CA voter, approved prop 2 funding to renovate public school buildings. Oakland public high schools should look towards attracting Oakland students with upper level/AP Mandarin Chinese Classes.

    Thank you,
    Fanny

  • Default_avatar
    ELI RA at October 21, 2025 at 1:51pm PDT

    I oppose the denial. Please support the application.