I support Prop 16. Yet, I am extremely concerned that throughout the Superintendent Report, Chief Academic Officer report that Black students were not specifically named as a vulnerable population: I heard SPED, ELL, some APIDA, unhoused, foster...NOT SPECIFICALLY Black Students. Even reading many pieces of the documents proposed the information supporting Black students read like "we will address as needed" with no specific strategies or dollar amounts attached. ALL I heard was anti-racism and anti-Blackness training. It is ANTI-BLACK to not specifically state Black students as a vulnerable population as a WHOLE.
I support Prop 16. Yet, I am extremely concerned that throughout the Superintendent Report, Chief Academic Officer report that Black students were not specifically named as a vulnerable population: I heard SPED, ELL, some APIDA, unhoused, foster...NOT SPECIFICALLY Black Students. Even reading many pieces of the documents proposed the information supporting Black students read like "we will address as needed" with no specific strategies or dollar amounts attached. ALL I heard was anti-racism and anti-Blackness training. It is ANTI-BLACK to not specifically state Black students as a vulnerable population as a WHOLE.